Navigate
Advertise here

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs GLM 5.2

The average score is effectively tied at 6.7 vs 6.7. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.153 vs $0.487. GLM 5.2 is faster at 9.65s vs 26.01s, with pass rates of 71.2% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-10

Compared models

Rank
#165
Total Output Tokens
139,572
Response Time (avg)
26.01s
Total Cost
$0.487
Rank
#164
Total Output Tokens
14,344
Response Time (avg)
9.65s
Total Cost
$0.153
Recommended model GLM 5.2

It has the best score here (6.7), while costing about 3.2x less than KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5.

Detailed comparison

Metric KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 none Release: 2026-07-14 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 6.7 6.7
Rank #165 #164
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.0 9.2
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 71.2% 63.6%
Flaky tests 8 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.419 1.312
Total Cost $0.487 $0.153
Input Price $0.740 / 1M $0.966 / 1M
Output Price $2.960 / 1M $3.036 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 98,508 112,458
Output Tokens 139,572 14,344
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 26.01s 9.65s
Response Time (max) 335.41s 79.65s
Response Time (total) 572.22s 212.38s
Parameters ~700B total (~72B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#165 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
29.0s
Tokens
3,439 tok

#164 GLM 5.2

none
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 6.1 4.7 66.7% 2 22.52s 7,893 22,440 0
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair