Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium) vs Qwen3.6 Flash (medium)

KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium) leads on average score with 6.9 vs 6.9. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.467 vs $0.738. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium) is faster at 24.04s vs 44.65s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#89
Total Output Tokens
135,464
Response Time (avg)
24.04s
Total Cost
$0.467
Rank
#93
Total Output Tokens
634,338
Response Time (avg)
44.65s
Total Cost
$0.738
Recommended model KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 (medium)

It has the best score here (6.9), while costing about 1.6x less than Qwen3.6 Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 medium Release: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.9 6.9
Rank #89 #93
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.4 8.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 68.2%
Flaky tests 7 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.237 6.784
Total Cost $0.467 $0.738
Input Price $0.740 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $2.960 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 87,907 129,041
Output Tokens 7,213 20,026
Reasoning Tokens 128,251 614,312
Response Time (avg) 24.04s 44.65s
Response Time (max) 257.00s 578.13s
Response Time (total) 528.92s 982.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#89 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

medium
Cost
$0.009
Time
25.6s
Tokens
2,939 tok

#93 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.008
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,784 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 33.10s 7,893 416 33,658
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair