Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs Poolside: Laguna XS 2.1

Laguna XS 2.1 leads on average score with 5.3 vs 4.9. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.008. Laguna XS 2.1 is faster at 1.55s vs 10.68s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 30.3%.

Recommended modelLaguna XS 2.1It has the best score here (5.3), while responding about 6.9x faster than Ling-2.6-flash.

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21 Laguna XS 2.1 Laguna XS 2.1 none Release: 2026-07-02 Free Available
Score 4.9 5.3
Rank #184 #166
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 30.3%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.024 0.143
Total Cost $0.002 $0.008
Input Price $0.010 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Output Price $0.030 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 114,375 91,598
Output Tokens 14,903 13,377
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 10.68s 1.55s
Response Time (max) 36.03s 19.02s
Response Time (total) 213.51s 34.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#184 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#166 Laguna XS 2.1

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
27.6s
Tokens
4,344 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0
Laguna XS 2.1 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 623ms 7,995 562 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair