Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano

Summary

Ling-2.6-flash vs GPT-5 Nano benchmark comparison: GPT-5 Nano leads on average score with 6.3 vs 5.0. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.001 vs $0.081. Ling-2.6-flash is faster at 9.34s vs 42.51s, with pass rates of 31.8% vs 57.1%.

Recommended model: Ling-2.6-flash - It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (5.0), lower cost than GPT-5 Nano, and balanced response time.

Last updated at: 2026-06-04

Metric Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21 GPT-5 Nano GPT-5 Nano medium Release: 2025-08-07
Score 5.0 6.3
Rank #138 #94
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 7.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 31.8% 57.1%
Flaky tests 2 7
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.005 0.897
Total Cost $0.001 $0.081
Input Price $0.010 / 1M $0.050 / 1M
Output Price $0.030 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 40,718 34,108
Output Tokens 2,878 5,464
Reasoning Tokens 0 192,064
Response Time (avg) 9.34s 42.51s
Response Time (max) 35.34s 204.02s
Response Time (total) 177.48s 595.09s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#138 Ling-2.6-flash

none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
$0.000
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

#94 GPT-5 Nano

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
108.5s
Tokens
13,209 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 6.8 8.1 58.3% 1 11.81s 726 573 0
GPT-5 Nano 6.5 7.9 58.3% 1 25.50s 606 1,221 21,184
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0
GPT-5 Nano 7.0 7.7 55.6% 1 41.62s 7,305 740 41,152
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 35.34s 20,818 1,069 0
GPT-5 Nano 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 65.96s 11,019 578 17,984
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 8.48s 8,004 246 0
GPT-5 Nano 3.7 1.7 50.0% 2 21.42s 7,140 453 10,560
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.95s 810 24 0
GPT-5 Nano 5.2 4.4 55.6% 2 204.02s 619 237 64,448
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 4.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.45s 540 109 0
GPT-5 Nano 4.1 10.0 0.0% 0 17.51s 477 202 4,608
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 5.52s 732 81 0
GPT-5 Nano 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 15.64s 660 312 4,736
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 2.9 7.2 11.1% 1 6.51s 729 151 0
GPT-5 Nano 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 20.63s 642 929 14,272
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 18.80s 7,324 229 0
GPT-5 Nano 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 33.30s 5,445 558 6,976
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.06s 222 15 0
GPT-5 Nano 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 20.13s 195 234 6,144

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair