Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 leads on average score with 5.5 vs 4.9. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.127. Ling-2.6-flash is faster at 10.68s vs 19.15s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 34.9%.

Recommended modelLing-2.6-flashIts score stays close to the best score here (4.9 vs 5.5), while costing about 79.7x less than Kimi K2.5.

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21 Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 none Release: 2026-01-27
Score 4.9 5.5
Rank #184 #161
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 30.3% 34.9%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.024 1.898
Total Cost $0.002 $0.127
Input Price $0.010 / 1M $0.571 / 1M
Output Price $0.030 / 1M $2.850 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 114,375 89,322
Output Tokens 14,903 26,638
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 10.68s 19.15s
Response Time (max) 36.03s 102.83s
Response Time (total) 213.51s 287.30s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#184 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#161 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

none
Cost
$0.015
Time
89.1s
Tokens
5,421 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0
Kimi K2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 24.56s 7,311 4,708 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair