- Rank
- #259
- Total Output Tokens
- 82,585
- Response Time (avg)
- 3.51s
- Total Cost
- $0.018
Mercury 2.5 Preview vs Ring-2.6-1T
Mercury 2.5 Preview leads on average score with 4.9 vs 4.8. Mercury 2.5 Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.018 vs $0.026. Mercury 2.5 Preview is faster at 3.51s vs 51.99s, with pass rates of 30.3% vs 45.5%.
- Rank
- #263
- Total Output Tokens
- 40,277
- Response Time (avg)
- 51.99s
- Total Cost
- $0.026
Recommended model
Mercury 2.5 Preview
It has the best score here (4.9), while responding about 14.8x faster than Ring-2.6-1T.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Mercury 2.5 Preview Mercury 2.5 Preview none | Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.9 | 4.8 |
| Rank | #259 | #263 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 30.3% | 45.5% |
| Flaky tests | 5 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 0.440 | 0.037 |
| Total Cost | $0.018 | $0.026 |
| Input Price | $0.040 / 1M | $0.075 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.150 / 1M | $0.625 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 130,296 | 7,608 |
| Output Tokens | 82,585 | 40,277 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 3.51s | 51.99s |
| Response Time (max) | 60.70s | 143.82s |
| Response Time (total) | 77.28s | 831.90s |
| Parameters | ~100B | 1T total (63B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#259 Mercury 2.5 Preview
none
Invalid SVG
- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 3.3s
- Tokens
- 3,122 tok
#263 Ring-2.6-1T
none
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 3.8 | 8.3 | 16.7% | 1 | 655ms | 812 | 256 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 9.2 | 8.4 | 91.7% | 1 | 43.33s | 810 | 5,575 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 4.7 | 7.9 | 22.2% | 1 | 459ms | 7,850 | 650 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 143.82s | 834 | 5,036 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 31.28s | 101,129 | 80,273 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.04s | 8,333 | 672 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 45.87s | 2,712 | 1,529 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 631ms | 875 | 40 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 56.85s | 882 | 18,051 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 482ms | 544 | 85 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 4.3 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 15.63s | 561 | 846 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.26s | 753 | 73 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 27.36s | 774 | 2,004 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 5.6 | 7.4 | 44.4% | 1 | 684ms | 796 | 292 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 31.47s | 792 | 3,469 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.29s | 8,969 | 229 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 419ms | 235 | 15 | 0 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 133.60s | 243 | 3,767 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Ring-2.6-1TnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsRing-2.6-1TnoneMercury 2.5 PreviewnonevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableMercury 2.5 PreviewnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableMercury 2.5 PreviewnonevsMiniMax M2.7mediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsMercury 2.5 PreviewnoneCobuddymediumvsRing-2.6-1TnoneRing-2.6-1TnonevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsRing-2.6-1TnoneRing-2.6-1TnonevsMiniMax M2.7mediumGranite 4.2 8BhighvsRing-2.6-1TnoneGranite 4.2 8BlowvsMercury 2.5 Previewnone