- Rank
- #254
- Total Output Tokens
- 31,975
- Response Time (avg)
- 1.31s
- Total Cost
- $0.011
Mercury 2.5 Preview (low) vs Ring-2.6-1T
Mercury 2.5 Preview (low) leads on average score with 5.0 vs 4.8. Mercury 2.5 Preview (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.011 vs $0.026. Mercury 2.5 Preview (low) is faster at 1.31s vs 51.99s, with pass rates of 47.0% vs 45.5%.
- Rank
- #263
- Total Output Tokens
- 40,277
- Response Time (avg)
- 51.99s
- Total Cost
- $0.026
Recommended model
Mercury 2.5 Preview (low)
It has the best score here (5.0), while costing about 2.5x less than Ring-2.6-1T.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Mercury 2.5 Preview Mercury 2.5 Preview low | Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 5.0 | 4.8 |
| Rank | #254 | #263 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.0 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 47.0% | 45.5% |
| Flaky tests | 8 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 0.169 | 0.037 |
| Total Cost | $0.011 | $0.026 |
| Input Price | $0.040 / 1M | $0.075 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.150 / 1M | $0.625 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 133,525 | 7,608 |
| Output Tokens | 7,259 | 40,277 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 24,716 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 1.31s | 51.99s |
| Response Time (max) | 7.29s | 143.82s |
| Response Time (total) | 28.77s | 831.90s |
| Parameters | ~100B | 1T total (63B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#254 Mercury 2.5 Preview
low- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 1.5s
- Tokens
- 1,169 tok
#263 Ring-2.6-1T
none
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 5.6 | 3.8 | 66.7% | 3 | 759ms | 786 | 290 | 3,019 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 9.2 | 8.4 | 91.7% | 1 | 43.33s | 810 | 5,575 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 972ms | 7,794 | 695 | 2,263 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 143.82s | 834 | 5,036 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.77s | 110,517 | 5,013 | 9,661 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.12s | 8,309 | 611 | 1,521 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 45.87s | 2,712 | 1,529 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 4.1 | 4.4 | 44.5% | 2 | 836ms | 849 | 45 | 2,247 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 56.85s | 882 | 18,051 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.05s | 540 | 105 | 749 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 4.3 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 15.63s | 561 | 846 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.60s | 745 | 99 | 1,492 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 27.36s | 774 | 2,004 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 710ms | 777 | 312 | 2,271 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 31.47s | 792 | 3,469 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 2.8 | 1.6 | 33.3% | 1 | 1.57s | 2,983 | 76 | 739 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 591ms | 225 | 13 | 754 | |
| Ring-2.6-1T | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 133.60s | 243 | 3,767 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Ring-2.6-1TnonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsMiniMax M2.7mediumDeepSeek V3.2nonevsMercury 2.5 PreviewlowTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsRing-2.6-1TnoneNorth Mini CodenoneFree AvailablevsMercury 2.5 PreviewlowMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsGPT-4o-mininoneMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsQwen3.5-9BnoneMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsMiMo-V2.5noneMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsQwen3 Coder NextnoneMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsMistral Small 4mediumMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsMistral Small 4noneMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumFree Available