- Rank
- #301
- Total Output Tokens
- 36,870
- Response Time (avg)
- 4.92s
- Total Cost
- $0.015
Mercury 2.5 Preview (low) vs Ling 2.6 1t
Mercury 2.5 Preview (low) leads on average score with 5.0 vs 4.9. Mercury 2.5 Preview (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.015 vs $0.016. Mercury 2.5 Preview (low) is faster at 4.92s vs 8.16s, with pass rates of 44.9% vs 17.4%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #311
- Total Output Tokens
- 11,555
- Response Time (avg)
- 8.16s
- Total Cost
- $0.016
Recommended model
Mercury 2.5 Preview (low)
It has the best score here (5.0), while responding about 1.7x faster than Ling 2.6 1t.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Mercury 2.5 Preview Mercury 2.5 Preview low | Ling 2.6 1t Ling 2.6 1t none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 5.0 | 4.9 |
| Rank | #301 | #311 |
| Reliability | 9.9 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 7.1 | 10.0 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 44.9% | 17.4% |
| Flaky tests | 8 | 0 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.244 | 0.278 |
| Total Cost | $0.015 | $0.016 |
| Input Price | $0.040 / 1M | $0.075 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.150 / 1M | $0.625 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | N/A |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 235,438 | 106,423 |
| Output Tokens | 8,136 | 11,555 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 28,734 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 4.92s | 8.16s |
| Response Time (max) | 84.47s | 25.72s |
| Response Time (total) | 113.24s | 163.24s |
| Parameters | ~100B | 1T total (63B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Open source |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#301 Mercury 2.5 Preview
low- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 1.5s
- Tokens
- 1,169 tok
#311 Ling 2.6 1t
none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.1s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 84.47s | 101,913 | 877 | 4,018 | |
| Ling 2.6 1t | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 38ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 5.6 | 3.8 | 66.7% | 3 | 759ms | 786 | 290 | 3,019 | |
| Ling 2.6 1t | 3.4 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 6.55s | 726 | 777 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 972ms | 7,794 | 695 | 2,263 | |
| Ling 2.6 1t | 3.8 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 10.57s | 813 | 381 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.77s | 110,517 | 5,013 | 9,661 | |
| Ling 2.6 1t | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 23.79s | 80,539 | 9,304 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 1.12s | 8,309 | 611 | 1,521 | |
| Ling 2.6 1t | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.37s | 8,313 | 285 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 4.1 | 4.4 | 44.5% | 2 | 836ms | 849 | 45 | 2,247 | |
| Ling 2.6 1t | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.08s | 819 | 27 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.05s | 540 | 105 | 749 | |
| Ling 2.6 1t | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 20.34s | 540 | 140 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 1.60s | 745 | 99 | 1,492 | |
| Ling 2.6 1t | 6.4 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 5.36s | 732 | 81 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 8.2 | 7.2 | 88.9% | 1 | 710ms | 777 | 312 | 2,271 | |
| Ling 2.6 1t | 3.1 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 5.36s | 729 | 131 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 2.8 | 1.6 | 33.3% | 1 | 1.57s | 2,983 | 76 | 739 | |
| Ling 2.6 1t | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 25.72s | 13,212 | 429 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 591ms | 225 | 13 | 754 | |
| Ling 2.6 1t | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0ms | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Ling 2.6 1tnonevsLaguna S 2.1highFree AvailableMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsLaguna S 2.1mediumFree AvailableMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsMiniMax M2.7mediumDots 3 Note PreviewnoneFree AvailablevsMercury 2.5 PreviewlowApodex 1.1 MininoneFree AvailablevsMercury 2.5 PreviewlowMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsGPT-4o-mininoneMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsMiMo-V2.5-PrononeLing 2.6 1tnonevsKAT Coder AIR V2.5lowMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsKAT Coder AIR V2.5mediumLing 2.6 1tnonevsMiniMax M2.7mediumMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsMistral Small 4noneMercury 2.5 PreviewlowvsMistral Small 4medium