Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

Summary

Gemma 4 31B vs Kimi K2.5 benchmark comparison: Gemma 4 31B leads on average score with 6.1 vs 5.5. Gemma 4 31B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.004 vs $0.027. Gemma 4 31B is faster at 4.05s vs 13.18s, with pass rates of 47.6% vs 34.9%.

Recommended model: Gemma 4 31B - It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 9.0x less than Kimi K2.5.

Last updated at: 2026-07-09

Metric Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 none Release: 2026-01-27
Score 6.1 5.5
Rank #113 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.6% 34.9%
Flaky tests 0 3
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.034 0.442
Total Cost $0.004 $0.027
Input Price $0.120 / 1M $0.375 / 1M
Output Price $0.350 / 1M $2.025 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 20,911 36,034
Output Tokens 1,407 6,657
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 4.05s 13.18s
Response Time (max) 26.13s 42.13s
Response Time (total) 76.87s 184.47s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#113 Gemma 4 31B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
12.8s
Tokens
795 tok

#135 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

none
Cost
$0.015
Time
89.1s
Tokens
5,421 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 1.85s 852 45 0
Kimi K2.5 3.6 8.4 8.3% 1 6.24s 652 373 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 11.19s 8,381 735 0
Kimi K2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 24.56s 7,311 4,708 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
Kimi K2.5 2.8 2.1 33.3% 1 19.16s 12,264 748 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.25s 8,352 285 0
Kimi K2.5 7.3 5.8 83.3% 1 42.13s 7,180 187 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.22s 903 27 0
Kimi K2.5 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 4.38s 753 29 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.09s 576 117 0
Kimi K2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.00s 483 76 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 2.84s 795 78 0
Kimi K2.5 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 2.67s 677 60 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 6.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.23s 828 108 0
Kimi K2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.04s 667 236 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0
Kimi K2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 13.99s 5,835 220 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.25s 224 12 0
Kimi K2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.90s 212 20 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair