Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemma 4 31B vs LongCat 2.0

LongCat 2.0 leads on average score with 6.4 vs 6.1. Gemma 4 31B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.016 vs $0.044. LongCat 2.0 is faster at 5.17s vs 5.41s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 40.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-20

Rank
#178
Total Output Tokens
13,317
Response Time (avg)
5.41s
Total Cost
$0.016
Rank
#159
Total Output Tokens
9,375
Response Time (avg)
5.17s
Total Cost
$0.044
Recommended model LongCat 2.0

It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.4) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 none Release: 2026-07-20
Score 6.1 6.4
Rank #178 #159
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.3
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 40.9%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.366 0.549
Total Cost $0.016 $0.044
Input Price $0.090 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $0.340 / 1M $1.200 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 125,703 108,752
Output Tokens 13,317 9,375
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 5.41s 5.17s
Response Time (max) 29.95s 48.38s
Response Time (total) 108.12s 113.83s
Parameters 30.7B 1.6T total (48B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#178 Gemma 4 31B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
12.8s
Tokens
795 tok

#159 LongCat 2.0

none
Cost
$0.027
Time
411.7s
Tokens
22,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 11.19s 8,381 735 0
LongCat 2.0 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.85s 7,446 578 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair