Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs inclusionAI: Ring-2.6-1T

Gemma 4 31B (medium) leads on average score with 6.3 vs 4.8. Ring-2.6-1T has the lower benchmark cost at $0.026 vs $0.116. Ring-2.6-1T is faster at 55.10s vs 75.38s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 45.5%.

Recommended modelGemma 4 31B (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B medium Release: 2026-04-02 Free Available Ring-2.6-1T Ring-2.6-1T none Release: 2026-05-10
Score 6.3 4.8
Rank #121 #194
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 45.5%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.044 0.000
Total Cost $0.116 $0.026
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.075 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $0.625 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 94,992 7,599
Output Tokens 34,468 39,954
Reasoning Tokens 223,278 0
Response Time (avg) 75.38s 55.10s
Response Time (max) 437.40s 143.82s
Response Time (total) 1507.52s 881.55s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#121 Gemma 4 31B

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
45.7s
Tokens
2,696 tok

#194 Ring-2.6-1T

none
Ring-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ring-2.6-1t
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 31B 4.3 5.8 22.2% 1 219.76s 5,568 11,098 33,212
Ring-2.6-1T 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 143.82s 834 5,036 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair