Navigate
Advertise here

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.6 27B

The average score is effectively tied at 5.6 vs 5.5. Gemma 4 26B A4B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.015 vs $0.062. Gemma 4 26B A4B is faster at 7.58s vs 10.62s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 45.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-08

Compared models

Rank
#233
Total Output Tokens
15,781
Response Time (avg)
7.58s
Total Cost
$0.015
Rank
#239
Total Output Tokens
16,156
Response Time (avg)
10.62s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Gemma 4 26B A4B

It has the best score here (5.6), while costing about 4.2x less than Qwen3.6 27B.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemma 4 26B A4B none Release: 2026-04-03 Free Available Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.6 5.5
Rank #233 #239
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 7.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 45.5%
Flaky tests 1 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.208 1.220
Total Cost $0.015 $0.062
Input Price $0.070 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $0.340 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 131,257 95,805
Output Tokens 15,781 16,156
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 7.58s 10.62s
Response Time (max) 57.10s 156.31s
Response Time (total) 166.82s 233.68s
Parameters 25.2B total (3.8B active) 27B
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#233 Gemma 4 26B A4B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
39.5s
Tokens
790 tok

#239 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 4.16s 7,736 476 0
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair