Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.6 27B leads on average score with 5.5 vs 5.5. Gemma 4 26B A4B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.022 vs $0.067. Gemma 4 26B A4B is faster at 7.64s vs 10.65s, with pass rates of 42.4% vs 45.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#168
Total Output Tokens
15,781
Response Time (avg)
7.64s
Total Cost
$0.022
Rank
#164
Total Output Tokens
16,155
Response Time (avg)
10.65s
Total Cost
$0.067
Recommended model Gemma 4 26B A4B

Its score stays close to the best score here (5.5 vs 5.5), while costing about 3.1x less than Qwen3.6 27B.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemma 4 26B A4B none Release: 2026-04-03 Free Available Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.5 5.5
Rank #168 #164
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.4% 45.5%
Flaky tests 2 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.235 1.220
Total Cost $0.022 $0.067
Input Price $0.120 / 1M $0.290 / 1M
Output Price $0.350 / 1M $2.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 131,282 95,796
Output Tokens 15,781 16,155
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 7.64s 10.65s
Response Time (max) 57.10s 156.31s
Response Time (total) 167.98s 234.39s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#168 Gemma 4 26B A4B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
39.5s
Tokens
790 tok

#164 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 4.16s 7,736 476 0
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair