Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs inclusionAI: Ling-2.6-flash

Gemma 4 26B A4B leads on average score with 5.5 vs 4.9. Ling-2.6-flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.002 vs $0.015. Gemma 4 26B A4B is faster at 7.64s vs 10.68s, with pass rates of 42.4% vs 30.3%.

Recommended modelGemma 4 26B A4BIt has the strongest score in this comparison (5.5) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemma 4 26B A4B Gemma 4 26B A4B none Release: 2026-04-03 Free Available Ling-2.6-flash Ling-2.6-flash none Release: 2026-04-21
Score 5.5 4.9
Rank #162 #184
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.4% 30.3%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.235 0.024
Total Cost $0.015 $0.002
Input Price $0.070 / 1M $0.010 / 1M
Output Price $0.340 / 1M $0.030 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 131,282 114,375
Output Tokens 15,781 14,903
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 7.64s 10.68s
Response Time (max) 57.10s 36.03s
Response Time (total) 167.98s 213.51s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#162 Gemma 4 26B A4B

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
39.5s
Tokens
790 tok

#184 Ling-2.6-flash

none
Ling-2.6-flash is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemma 4 26B A4B 3.7 7.2 22.2% 1 4.16s 7,736 476 0
Ling-2.6-flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 11.21s 813 381 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair