Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3 Flash Preview (medium) vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Gemini 3 Flash Preview (medium) leads on average score with 9.6 vs 6.1. Qwen3.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.062 vs $0.742. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 3.74s vs 19.20s, with pass rates of 98.5% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#3
Total Output Tokens
232,650
Response Time (avg)
19.20s
Total Cost
$0.742
Rank
#135
Total Output Tokens
30,947
Response Time (avg)
3.74s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Gemini 3 Flash Preview (medium)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.6) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3 Flash Preview Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Release: 2025-12-17 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 9.6 6.1
Rank #3 #135
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 98.5% 34.9%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.533 0.935
Total Cost $0.742 $0.062
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 87,861 139,788
Output Tokens 5,486 30,947
Reasoning Tokens 227,164 0
Response Time (avg) 19.20s 3.74s
Response Time (max) 117.26s 48.79s
Response Time (total) 422.42s 82.38s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#3 Gemini 3 Flash Preview

medium
Cost
$0.010
Time
18.4s
Tokens
3,351 tok

#135 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 84.40s 8,122 462 161,084
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair