Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

Gemini 3 Flash Preview (medium) leads on average score with 9.6 vs 6.5. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.090 vs $0.742. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 4.76s vs 19.20s, with pass rates of 98.5% vs 40.9%.

Recommended modelGemini 3 Flash Preview (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.6) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-18

Metric Gemini 3 Flash Preview Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Release: 2025-12-17 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 9.6 6.5
Rank #1 #100
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 98.5% 40.9%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 3.533 0.763
Total Cost $0.742 $0.090
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $2.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 87,861 102,316
Output Tokens 5,486 24,321
Reasoning Tokens 227,164 0
Response Time (avg) 19.20s 4.76s
Response Time (max) 117.26s 69.46s
Response Time (total) 422.42s 104.71s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#1 Gemini 3 Flash Preview

medium
Cost
$0.010
Time
18.4s
Tokens
3,351 tok

#100 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 84.40s 8,122 462 161,084
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair