Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview (medium) leads on average score with 8.4 vs 7.0. Gemini 3.5 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $1.079 vs $1.143. Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster at 9.93s vs 67.53s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 80.3%.

Recommended modelQwen3.6 Max Preview (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.4) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash none Release: 2026-05-19 Qwen3.6 Max Preview Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.0 8.4
Rank #87 #25
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 8.9 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 80.3%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 7.190 8.173
Total Cost $1.079 $1.143
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $1.040 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $6.240 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 13,843 79,240
Output Tokens 117,518 5,098
Reasoning Tokens 0 164,842
Response Time (avg) 9.93s 67.53s
Response Time (max) 64.36s 238.07s
Response Time (total) 178.68s 1485.64s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#87 Gemini 3.5 Flash

none
Cost
$0.225
Time
125.5s
Tokens
25,004 tok

#25 Qwen3.6 Max Preview

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
76.5s
Tokens
3,861 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 34.69s 8,122 75,927 0
Qwen3.6 Max Preview 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 146.48s 7,895 427 52,957

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair