Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium)

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium) leads on average score with 7.5 vs 7.0. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.437 vs $1.079. Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster at 9.93s vs 89.19s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 71.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#89
Total Output Tokens
117,518
Response Time (avg)
9.93s
Total Cost
$1.079
Rank
#66
Total Output Tokens
260,704
Response Time (avg)
89.19s
Total Cost
$0.437
Recommended model Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium)

It has the best score here (7.5), while costing about 2.5x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash none Release: 2026-05-19 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Release: 2026-02-15
Score 7.0 7.5
Rank #89 #66
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.5
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 71.2%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 7.190 3.348
Total Cost $1.079 $0.437
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 13,843 113,560
Output Tokens 117,518 9,823
Reasoning Tokens 0 250,881
Response Time (avg) 9.93s 89.19s
Response Time (max) 64.36s 304.85s
Response Time (total) 178.68s 1337.92s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#89 Gemini 3.5 Flash

none
Cost
$0.225
Time
125.5s
Tokens
25,004 tok

#66 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

medium
Cost
$0.011
Time
125.5s
Tokens
7,040 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 34.69s 8,122 75,927 0
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 6.6 7.1 44.4% 1 180.70s 6,950 420 80,595

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair