Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) vs GPT-5 Nano (medium)

Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) leads on average score with 6.8 vs 6.1. GPT-5 Nano (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.114 vs $0.300. Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal) is faster at 2.65s vs 54.87s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 56.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#96
Total Output Tokens
16,454
Response Time (avg)
2.65s
Total Cost
$0.300
Rank
#139
Total Output Tokens
273,098
Response Time (avg)
54.87s
Total Cost
$0.114
Recommended model Gemini 3.5 Flash (minimal)

It has the best score here (6.8), while responding about 20.7x faster than GPT-5 Nano (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash minimal Release: 2026-05-19 GPT-5 Nano GPT-5 Nano medium Release: 2025-08-07
Score 6.8 6.1
Rank #96 #139
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 7.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 56.1%
Flaky tests 1 8
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.138 1.267
Total Cost $0.300 $0.114
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.050 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 100,753 94,935
Output Tokens 16,454 12,042
Reasoning Tokens 0 261,056
Response Time (avg) 2.65s 54.87s
Response Time (max) 25.26s 227.89s
Response Time (total) 58.27s 822.99s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 Gemini 3.5 Flash

minimal
Cost
$0.041
Time
20.4s
Tokens
4,608 tok

#139 GPT-5 Nano

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
108.5s
Tokens
13,209 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 5.6 9.9 33.3% 0 2.75s 8,122 3,456 0
GPT-5 Nano 7.0 7.7 55.6% 1 41.62s 7,305 740 41,152

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair