Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

Summary

Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen3.6 27B benchmark comparison: Gemini 3.5 Flash leads on average score with 9.4 vs 5.6. Qwen3.6 27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.349. Gemini 3.5 Flash is faster at 3.27s vs 3.72s, with pass rates of 90.5% vs 47.6%.

Recommended model: Gemini 3.5 Flash - It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.4) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-06-10

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash low Release: 2026-05-19 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 9.4 5.6
Rank #3 #119
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 90.5% 47.6%
Flaky tests 0 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 1.834 0.467
Total Cost $0.349 $0.025
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.290 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $2.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 36,938 52,721
Output Tokens 2,033 3,812
Reasoning Tokens 30,519 0
Response Time (avg) 3.27s 3.72s
Response Time (max) 9.05s 11.82s
Response Time (total) 68.65s 78.08s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#3 Gemini 3.5 Flash

low
Cost
$0.068
Time
39.1s
Tokens
7,588 tok

#119 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.52s 494 209 2,536
Qwen3.6 27B 3.8 3.7 41.7% 3 2.83s 696 490 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 6.71s 8,118 458 13,420
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 6.44s 12,873 351 3,050
Qwen3.6 27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 9.95s 22,497 1,401 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.81s 7,548 279 1,164
Qwen3.6 27B 7.3 5.8 83.3% 1 2.06s 7,788 248 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.39s 633 12 4,538
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.03s 789 24 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.27s 486 119 916
Qwen3.6 27B 5.2 9.9 0.0% 0 1.07s 522 72 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 9.9 10.0 100.0% 0 1.86s 615 71 1,652
Qwen3.6 27B 6.2 5.8 66.7% 1 1.92s 711 49 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.35s 558 288 2,150
Qwen3.6 27B 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 5.15s 714 639 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.27s 5,457 234 403
Qwen3.6 27B 9.5 10.0 100.0% 0 6.74s 10,881 339 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.88s 156 12 690
Qwen3.6 27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.03s 210 11 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair