Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Summary

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.8 vs 8.5. Step 3.7 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.376 vs $1.115. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 8.84s vs 20.35s, with pass rates of 96.8% vs 73.0%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the best score here (9.8), while responding about 2.3x faster than Step 3.7 Flash (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-05-29
Score 9.8 8.5
Rank #1 #23
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.6 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 96.8% 73.0%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 63 61
Cost per result 5.575 2.686
Total Cost $1.115 $0.376
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,594 39,981
Output Tokens 1,975 319,958
Reasoning Tokens 115,638 0
Response Time (avg) 8.84s 20.35s
Response Time (max) 34.82s 113.98s
Response Time (total) 185.57s 427.42s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#1 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

#23 Step 3.7 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
46.2s
Tokens
4,466 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
Step 3.7 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 27.42s 7,437 44,797 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair