#9 Claude Fable 5
medium- Cost
- $0.606
- Time
- 156.7s
- Tokens
- 12,264 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Summary
Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.8 vs 9.2. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.115 vs $3.165. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 8.84s vs 17.01s, with pass rates of 82.5% vs 96.8%.
Last updated at: 2026-07-14
| Metric | Claude Fable 5 Claude Fable 5 medium | Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 9.2 | 9.8 |
| Rank | #9 | #1 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.6 | 9.6 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 82.5% | 96.8% |
| Flaky tests | 1 | 1 |
| Total Runs | 63 | 63 |
| Cost per result | 18.614 | 5.575 |
| Total Cost | $3.165 | $1.115 |
| Input Price | $10.000 / 1M | $1.500 / 1M |
| Output Price | $50.000 / 1M | $9.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 58,383 | 37,594 |
| Output Tokens | 41,340 | 1,975 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 10,269 | 115,638 |
| Response Time (avg) | 17.01s | 8.84s |
| Response Time (max) | 80.80s | 34.82s |
| Response Time (total) | 357.17s | 185.57s |
Generation showcase
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 15.59s | 10,590 | 7,383 | 1,318 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 22.96s | 8,118 | 456 | 47,129 |
Switch Comparison Pair