Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Summary

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.8 vs 9.2. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.115 vs $3.165. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 8.84s vs 17.01s, with pass rates of 82.5% vs 96.8%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the best score here (9.8), while costing about 2.8x less than Claude Fable 5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Claude Fable 5 Claude Fable 5 medium Release: 2026-06-10 Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19
Score 9.2 9.8
Rank #9 #1
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 82.5% 96.8%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 18.614 5.575
Total Cost $3.165 $1.115
Input Price $10.000 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Output Price $50.000 / 1M $9.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 58,383 37,594
Output Tokens 41,340 1,975
Reasoning Tokens 10,269 115,638
Response Time (avg) 17.01s 8.84s
Response Time (max) 80.80s 34.82s
Response Time (total) 357.17s 185.57s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#9 Claude Fable 5

medium
Cost
$0.606
Time
156.7s
Tokens
12,264 tok

#1 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Fable 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.59s 10,590 7,383 1,318
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair