Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Anthropic: Claude Fable 5 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.5 vs 8.6. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.976 vs $3.478. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 15.07s vs 17.20s, with pass rates of 78.8% vs 93.9%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the best score here (9.5), while costing about 1.8x less than Claude Fable 5 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Fable 5 Claude Fable 5 medium Release: 2026-06-10 Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19
Score 8.6 9.5
Rank #22 #4
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 78.8% 93.9%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 20.459 9.879
Total Cost $3.478 $1.976
Input Price $10.000 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Output Price $50.000 / 1M $9.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 89,643 107,137
Output Tokens 41,360 8,777
Reasoning Tokens 10,269 192,900
Response Time (avg) 17.20s 15.07s
Response Time (max) 80.80s 145.92s
Response Time (total) 378.41s 331.48s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#22 Claude Fable 5

medium
Cost
$0.606
Time
156.7s
Tokens
12,264 tok

#4 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Fable 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.59s 10,590 7,383 1,318
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair