Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

Summary

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) vs Qwen3.5-27B benchmark comparison: Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.8 vs 5.9. Qwen3.5-27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.015 vs $1.115. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 1.68s vs 8.84s, with pass rates of 96.8% vs 38.1%.

Recommended model: Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) - It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.8) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-10

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 9.8 5.9
Rank #1 #121
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 96.8% 38.1%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 5.575 0.249
Total Cost $1.115 $0.015
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 37,594 44,478
Output Tokens 1,975 3,592
Reasoning Tokens 115,638 0
Response Time (avg) 8.84s 1.68s
Response Time (max) 34.82s 9.39s
Response Time (total) 185.57s 35.25s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#1 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

#121 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.57s 492 174 4,997
Qwen3.5-27B 4.8 10.0 25.0% 0 788ms 696 267 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.37s 12,873 351 16,323
Qwen3.5-27B 2.8 1.6 33.3% 1 9.39s 16,918 1,461 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 6.43s 7,548 279 8,466
Qwen3.5-27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.43s 7,794 243 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 14.09s 633 12 24,721
Qwen3.5-27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 540ms 789 15 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.63s 486 115 1,650
Qwen3.5-27B 5.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.51s 522 126 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.35s 615 70 3,799
Qwen3.5-27B 6.3 10.0 50.0% 0 1.03s 711 69 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.23s 558 241 4,940
Qwen3.5-27B 6.7 7.9 55.6% 1 1.38s 714 683 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 4.96s 6,115 265 1,608
Qwen3.5-27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.54s 8,211 303 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.94s 156 12 2,005
Qwen3.5-27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 599ms 210 10 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair