Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.5 vs 7.2. Kimi K2.6 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.036 vs $1.976. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 15.07s vs 109.98s, with pass rates of 93.9% vs 63.6%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the best score here (9.5), while responding about 7.3x faster than Kimi K2.6 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19 Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 9.5 7.2
Rank #2 #68
Reliability 10.0 9.4
Consistency 9.3 8.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 93.9% 63.6%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 9.879 9.821
Total Cost $1.976 $1.036
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $0.684 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $3.420 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 107,137 68,902
Output Tokens 8,777 111,680
Reasoning Tokens 192,900 279,860
Response Time (avg) 15.07s 109.98s
Response Time (max) 145.92s 876.20s
Response Time (total) 331.48s 2309.56s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#2 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

#68 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

medium
Cost
$0.013
Time
103.4s
Tokens
3,620 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
Kimi K2.6 5.7 8.6 33.3% 0 214.42s 2,925 9,970 77,189

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair