Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs GPT-5 Nano (medium)

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview leads on average score with 6.4 vs 6.1. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview has the lower benchmark cost at $0.052 vs $0.114. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview is faster at 1.58s vs 54.87s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 56.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Rank
#116
Total Output Tokens
14,292
Response Time (avg)
1.58s
Total Cost
$0.052
Rank
#139
Total Output Tokens
273,098
Response Time (avg)
54.87s
Total Cost
$0.114
Recommended model Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

It has the best score here (6.4), while costing about 2.2x less than GPT-5 Nano (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Release: 2026-03-03 GPT-5 Nano GPT-5 Nano medium Release: 2025-08-07
Score 6.4 6.1
Rank #116 #139
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 7.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 56.1%
Flaky tests 1 8
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.431 1.267
Total Cost $0.052 $0.114
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.050 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 120,942 94,935
Output Tokens 14,292 12,042
Reasoning Tokens 0 261,056
Response Time (avg) 1.58s 54.87s
Response Time (max) 9.27s 227.89s
Response Time (total) 34.72s 822.99s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#116 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
4.7s
Tokens
1,827 tok

#139 GPT-5 Nano

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
108.5s
Tokens
13,209 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 967ms 8,128 670 0
GPT-5 Nano 7.0 7.7 55.6% 1 41.62s 7,305 740 41,152

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair