Navigate
Advertise here

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium) vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh)

Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh) leads on average score with 7.1 vs 7.0. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.158 vs ~$0.195. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium) is faster at 6.78s vs 102.66s, with pass rates of 60.9% vs 72.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#160
Total Output Tokens
59,534
Response Time (avg)
6.78s
Total Cost
$0.158
Rank
#154
Total Output Tokens
621,056
Response Time (avg)
102.66s
Total Cost
~$0.195
Recommended model Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.0 vs 7.1), while responding about 15.1x faster than Qwen3.8 Flash Next (xhigh).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Release: 2026-03-03 Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next xhigh Release: 2026-10-04
Score 7.0 7.1
Rank #160 #154
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 9.9 7.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 60.9% 72.5%
Flaky tests 0 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.124 ~1.390
Total Cost $0.158 ~$0.195
Input Price $0.250 / 1M N/A
Output Price $1.500 / 1M N/A
Cache Read Price $0.025 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price $0.084 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 272,221 301,749
Output Tokens 12,345 1,033
Reasoning Tokens 47,189 620,023
Response Time (avg) 6.78s 102.66s
Response Time (max) 54.91s 674.08s
Response Time (total) 155.96s 2361.10s
Parameters ~150B total (~10B active) 180B total (6B active)
Availability Closed Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#160 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
5.2s
Tokens
1,944 tok

#154 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

xhigh
Cost
~$0.010
Time
333.1s
Tokens
30,654 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.09s 8,126 461 8,597
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 7.4 7.0 77.8% 1 192.20s 8,235 122 186,070

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.2 ChatnoneEmber-1lowvsGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmediumQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashlowClaude Opus 5nonevsQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsMiMo-V2.5mediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsGrok 4.6lowGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsMuse Glimmer 30BlowGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashlowQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsStep 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.8 Flash NextxhighvsGLM 5mediumLongCat 2.0mediumvsQwen3.8 Flash Nextxhigh