Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium) leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.2. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.115 vs $1.036. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium) is faster at 4.61s vs 109.98s, with pass rates of 59.1% vs 63.6%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium)It has the best score here (7.3), while costing about 9.0x less than Kimi K2.6 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-20

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Release: 2026-03-03 Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.3 7.2
Rank #64 #68
Reliability 10.0 9.4
Consistency 9.9 8.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 59.1% 63.6%
Flaky tests 0 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.884 9.821
Total Cost $0.115 $1.036
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.684 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $3.420 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 117,480 68,902
Output Tokens 10,589 111,680
Reasoning Tokens 46,394 279,860
Response Time (avg) 4.61s 109.98s
Response Time (max) 18.34s 876.20s
Response Time (total) 101.39s 2309.56s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#64 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview

medium
Cost
$0.003
Time
5.2s
Tokens
1,944 tok

#68 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

medium
Cost
$0.013
Time
103.4s
Tokens
3,620 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.09s 8,126 461 8,597
Kimi K2.6 5.7 8.6 33.3% 0 214.42s 2,925 9,970 77,189

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair