Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-9B

Summary

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3.5-9B benchmark comparison: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite leads on average score with 6.4 vs 4.6. Qwen3.5-9B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.006 vs $0.013. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is faster at 1.33s vs 1.89s, with pass rates of 54.0% vs 20.6%.

Recommended model: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite - It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.4) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-06-10

Metric Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal Release: 2026-05-08 Qwen3.5-9B Qwen3.5-9B none Release: 2026-03-02
Score 6.4 4.6
Rank #88 #155
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 9.7
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 54.0% 20.6%
Flaky tests 3 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.130 0.123
Total Cost $0.013 $0.006
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 36,973 48,041
Output Tokens 2,487 3,952
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.33s 1.89s
Response Time (max) 4.49s 6.03s
Response Time (total) 27.91s 39.68s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#88 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

minimal
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.7s
Tokens
635 tok

#155 Qwen3.5-9B

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 8.3 10.0 75.0% 0 1.10s 500 639 0
Qwen3.5-9B 3.1 9.9 0.0% 0 1.71s 696 582 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 831ms 8,126 666 0
Qwen3.5-9B 3.9 7.8 11.1% 1 5.60s 7,913 1,042 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.53s 12,870 357 0
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 5.91s 20,397 1,255 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.04s 7,552 279 0
Qwen3.5-9B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 847ms 7,788 249 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 2.9 7.2 11.1% 1 1.02s 641 15 0
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 464ms 789 24 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 4.0 10.0 0.0% 0 791ms 490 63 0
Qwen3.5-9B 4.4 9.9 0.0% 0 552ms 522 99 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 932ms 615 72 0
Qwen3.5-9B 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 514ms 711 75 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 6.0 4.6 66.7% 2 2.15s 564 153 0
Qwen3.5-9B 3.2 10.0 0.0% 0 621ms 714 347 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.51s 5,457 234 0
Qwen3.5-9B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.27s 8,301 273 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 724ms 158 9 0
Qwen3.5-9B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.32s 210 6 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair