Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.8 27B leads on average score with 5.5 vs 5.4. Local hardware cost was not measured, so cost comparisons are unavailable. Qwen3.8 27B is faster at 3.12s vs 36.17s, with pass rates of 27.3% vs 40.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#213
Total Output Tokens
100,726
Response Time (avg)
36.17s
Total Cost
$0.062
Rank
#211
Total Output Tokens
11,445
Response Time (avg)
3.12s
Total Cost
N/A
Recommended model Qwen3.8 27B

It has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 11.6x faster than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423.

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 none Release: 2026-04-24 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B none Release: 2026-08-14
Score 5.4 5.5
Rank #213 #211
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 10.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 27.3% 40.9%
Flaky tests 4 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.146 N/A
Total Cost $0.062 N/A
Input Price $0.140 / 1M N/A
Output Price $0.280 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 240,230 122,463
Output Tokens 100,726 11,445
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 36.17s 3.12s
Response Time (max) 247.27s 44.76s
Response Time (total) 795.83s 68.69s
Parameters 284B total (13B active) 27.3B
Availability Open source Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#213 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
157.6s
Tokens
11,297 tok

#211 Qwen3.8 27B

none
Cost
N/A
Time
23.9s
Tokens
1,922 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0423 4.2 7.4 11.1% 1 17.13s 7,279 9,717 0
Qwen3.8 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.19s 7,911 408 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair