Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

DeepSeek V4 Flash leads on average score with 5.6 vs 5.5. DeepSeek V4 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.044 vs $0.127. Kimi K2.5 is faster at 19.15s vs 36.78s, with pass rates of 31.8% vs 34.9%.

Recommended modelDeepSeek V4 FlashIt has the best score here (5.6), while costing about 2.9x less than Kimi K2.5.

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash none Release: 2026-04-24 Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 none Release: 2026-01-27
Score 5.6 5.5
Rank #156 #161
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 31.8% 34.9%
Flaky tests 4 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.917 1.898
Total Cost $0.044 $0.127
Input Price $0.098 / 1M $0.571 / 1M
Output Price $0.196 / 1M $2.850 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 240,221 89,322
Output Tokens 100,727 26,638
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 36.78s 19.15s
Response Time (max) 247.27s 102.83s
Response Time (total) 809.09s 287.30s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#156 DeepSeek V4 Flash

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
157.6s
Tokens
11,297 tok

#161 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

none
Cost
$0.015
Time
89.1s
Tokens
5,421 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 4.2 7.4 11.1% 1 17.13s 7,279 9,717 0
Kimi K2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 24.56s 7,311 4,708 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair