Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (medium) vs Kimi K2.6 (medium)

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (medium) leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.2. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.106 vs $1.028. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (medium) is faster at 85.80s vs 109.98s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 63.6%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-01

Rank
#76
Total Output Tokens
618,417
Response Time (avg)
85.80s
Total Cost
$0.106
Rank
#81
Total Output Tokens
391,540
Response Time (avg)
109.98s
Total Cost
$1.028
Recommended model DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 (medium)

It has the best score here (7.3), while costing about 9.8x less than Kimi K2.6 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 medium Release: 2026-08-01 Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 medium Release: 2026-04-20
Score 7.3 7.2
Rank #76 #81
Reliability 9.8 9.4
Consistency 7.1 8.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 63.6%
Flaky tests 8 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.956 9.821
Total Cost $0.106 $1.028
Input Price $0.140 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Output Price $0.280 / 1M $3.410 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 89,768 68,902
Output Tokens 66,624 111,680
Reasoning Tokens 551,793 279,860
Response Time (avg) 85.80s 109.98s
Response Time (max) 288.78s 876.20s
Response Time (total) 1887.69s 2309.56s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#76 DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

medium
Cost
$0.004
Time
93.3s
Tokens
13,252 tok

#81 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

medium
Cost
$0.013
Time
103.4s
Tokens
3,620 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 6.4 4.4 77.8% 2 198.78s 6,032 4,109 160,154
Kimi K2.6 5.7 8.6 33.3% 0 214.42s 2,925 9,970 77,189

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair