Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Summary

MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads on average score with 5.5 vs 5.0. DeepSeek V3.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.054 vs $0.068. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is faster at 4.12s vs 18.25s, with pass rates of 37.9% vs 37.9%.

Recommended modelMiMo-V2.5-ProIt has the best score here (5.5), while responding about 4.4x faster than DeepSeek V3.2.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 none Release: 2025-12-01 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 5.0 5.5
Rank #165 #147
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.7 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 37.9% 37.9%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.870 1.509
Total Cost $0.054 $0.068
Input Price $0.269 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 135,780 124,799
Output Tokens 42,097 15,362
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 18.25s 4.12s
Response Time (max) 115.89s 53.13s
Response Time (total) 401.60s 90.55s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#165 DeepSeek V3.2

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
7.0s
Tokens
1,046 tok

#147 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
46.4s
Tokens
4,025 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 3.1 6.9 11.1% 1 14.54s 7,279 4,528 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 1.41s 6,559 485 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair