Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Summary

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.8 vs 5.3. DeepSeek V3.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.020 vs $1.115. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 8.84s vs 13.83s, with pass rates of 39.7% vs 96.8%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the best score here (9.8), while responding about 1.6x faster than DeepSeek V3.2.

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 none Release: 2025-12-01 Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19
Score 5.3 9.8
Rank #157 #1
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.6 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 39.7% 96.8%
Flaky tests 6 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.306 5.575
Total Cost $0.020 $1.115
Input Price $0.269 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $9.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 55,997 37,594
Output Tokens 11,165 1,975
Reasoning Tokens 0 115,638
Response Time (avg) 13.83s 8.84s
Response Time (max) 115.89s 34.82s
Response Time (total) 290.43s 185.57s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#157 DeepSeek V3.2

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
7.0s
Tokens
1,046 tok

#1 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 3.1 6.9 11.1% 1 14.54s 7,279 4,528 0
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair