Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

Summary

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) leads on average score with 6.1 vs 5.0. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.047 vs $0.054. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal) is faster at 1.86s vs 18.25s, with pass rates of 37.9% vs 51.5%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.1 Flash Lite (minimal)It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 9.8x faster than DeepSeek V3.2.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 none Release: 2025-12-01 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal Release: 2026-05-08
Score 5.0 6.1
Rank #165 #114
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.7 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 37.9% 51.5%
Flaky tests 6 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.870 0.465
Total Cost $0.054 $0.047
Input Price $0.269 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 135,780 119,065
Output Tokens 42,097 11,118
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 18.25s 1.86s
Response Time (max) 115.89s 12.97s
Response Time (total) 401.60s 40.88s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#165 DeepSeek V3.2

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
7.0s
Tokens
1,046 tok

#114 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite

minimal
Cost
$0.001
Time
3.7s
Tokens
635 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 3.1 6.9 11.1% 1 14.54s 7,279 4,528 0
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 831ms 8,126 666 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair