Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2 vs Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash

Summary

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) leads on average score with 9.5 vs 7.0. DeepSeek V3.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.078 vs $1.976. Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) is faster at 15.07s vs 68.62s, with pass rates of 65.2% vs 93.9%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the best score here (9.5), while responding about 4.6x faster than DeepSeek V3.2 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 medium Release: 2025-12-01 Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19
Score 7.0 9.5
Rank #73 #2
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.4 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.2% 93.9%
Flaky tests 7 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.671 9.879
Total Cost $0.078 $1.976
Input Price $0.269 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $9.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,047 107,137
Output Tokens 11,834 8,777
Reasoning Tokens 117,014 192,900
Response Time (avg) 68.62s 15.07s
Response Time (max) 376.10s 145.92s
Response Time (total) 1509.53s 331.48s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#73 DeepSeek V3.2

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
53.6s
Tokens
1,932 tok

#2 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V3.2 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 248.68s 5,717 649 52,014
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair