Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2

Summary

Claude Opus 4.8 leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.0. DeepSeek V3.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.078 vs $1.166. Claude Opus 4.8 is faster at 4.91s vs 68.62s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 65.2%.

Recommended modelDeepSeek V3.2 (medium)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.0 vs 7.3), while costing about 15.1x less than Claude Opus 4.8.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 none Release: 2026-05-28 DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 medium Release: 2025-12-01
Score 7.3 7.0
Rank #63 #73
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.2 7.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 65.2%
Flaky tests 2 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.969 0.671
Total Cost $1.166 $0.078
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.269 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 149,206 101,047
Output Tokens 16,797 11,834
Reasoning Tokens 0 117,014
Response Time (avg) 4.91s 68.62s
Response Time (max) 35.03s 376.10s
Response Time (total) 108.03s 1509.53s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#63 Claude Opus 4.8

none
Cost
$0.053
Time
22.0s
Tokens
2,253 tok

#73 DeepSeek V3.2

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
53.6s
Tokens
1,932 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.29s 10,590 1,332 0
DeepSeek V3.2 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 248.68s 5,717 649 52,014

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair