Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Lite vs GPT-5 Nano (medium)

Seed-2.0-Lite leads on average score with 6.2 vs 6.1. Seed-2.0-Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.066 vs $0.114. Seed-2.0-Lite is faster at 4.40s vs 54.87s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 56.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#130
Total Output Tokens
14,746
Response Time (avg)
4.40s
Total Cost
$0.066
Rank
#143
Total Output Tokens
273,098
Response Time (avg)
54.87s
Total Cost
$0.114
Recommended model Seed-2.0-Lite

It has the best score here (6.2), while costing about 1.8x less than GPT-5 Nano (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14 GPT-5 Nano GPT-5 Nano medium Release: 2025-08-07
Score 6.2 6.1
Rank #130 #143
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 7.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 56.1%
Flaky tests 4 8
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.814 1.267
Total Cost $0.066 $0.114
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $0.050 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 142,197 94,935
Output Tokens 14,746 12,042
Reasoning Tokens 0 261,056
Response Time (avg) 4.40s 54.87s
Response Time (max) 44.58s 227.89s
Response Time (total) 96.84s 822.99s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#130 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

#143 GPT-5 Nano

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
108.5s
Tokens
13,209 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0
GPT-5 Nano 7.0 7.7 55.6% 1 41.62s 7,305 740 41,152

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair