Navigate
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Lite (medium) vs Qwen3.8 27B (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.8 vs 7.8. Qwen3.8 27B (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.058 vs $0.236. Qwen3.8 27B (medium) is faster at 33.05s vs 47.94s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-28

Compared models

Rank
#102
Total Output Tokens
101,296
Response Time (avg)
47.94s
Total Cost
$0.236
Rank
#101
Total Output Tokens
136,162
Response Time (avg)
33.05s
Total Cost
~$0.058
Recommended model Qwen3.8 27B (medium)

It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 4.1x less than Seed-2.0-Lite (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite medium Release: 2026-02-14 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B medium Release: 2026-08-14
Score 7.8 7.8
Rank #102 #101
Reliability 10.0 9.6
Consistency 8.6 9.7
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 66.7%
Flaky tests 4 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.809 ~0.409
Total Cost $0.236 ~$0.058
Input Price $0.250 / 1M N/A
Output Price $2.000 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 129,906 98,266
Output Tokens 12,530 1,861
Reasoning Tokens 88,766 134,301
Response Time (avg) 47.94s 33.05s
Response Time (max) 254.92s 214.63s
Response Time (total) 1054.57s 694.04s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 27.3B
Availability Closed Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#102 Seed-2.0-Lite

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
86.7s
Tokens
2,354 tok

#101 Qwen3.8 27B

medium
Cost
~$0.002
Time
43.4s
Tokens
2,956 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 8.0 9.8 66.7% 0 156.74s 8,247 458 31,890
Qwen3.8 27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 40.50s 7,893 585 26,808

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair