Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Code vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B

The average score is effectively tied at 5.3 vs 5.3. Qwen3.6 35B A3B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.062 vs $0.151. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is faster at 5.52s vs 14.67s, with pass rates of 34.9% vs 31.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-12

Rank
#219
Total Output Tokens
23,432
Response Time (avg)
14.67s
Total Cost
$0.151
Rank
#216
Total Output Tokens
46,957
Response Time (avg)
5.52s
Total Cost
$0.062
Recommended model Qwen3.6 35B A3B

It has the best score here (5.3), while costing about 2.5x less than Seed-2.0-Code.

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Code Seed-2.0-Code none Release: 2026-08-12 Qwen3.6 35B A3B Qwen3.6 35B A3B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.3 5.3
Rank #219 #216
Reliability 6.7 10.0
Consistency 8.1 7.7
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 34.9% 31.8%
Flaky tests 5 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.503 1.496
Total Cost $0.151 $0.062
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 159,740 93,979
Output Tokens 23,432 46,957
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 14.67s 5.52s
Response Time (max) 132.84s 39.54s
Response Time (total) 322.75s 110.40s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 35B total (3B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#219 Seed-2.0-Code

none
Cost
$0.030
Time
140.6s
Tokens
9,924 tok

#216 Qwen3.6 35B A3B

none
Cost
$0.008
Time
30.1s
Tokens
6,317 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Code 3.6 9.8 0.0% 0 13.42s 7,230 505 0
Qwen3.6 35B A3B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 8.77s 7,911 11,161 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair