- Rank
- #266
- Total Output Tokens
- 932,619
- Response Time (avg)
- 75.86s
- Total Cost
- $0.592
Trinity Large Thinking (high) vs Granite 4.2 8B
Trinity Large Thinking (high) leads on average score with 4.8 vs 4.3. Granite 4.2 8B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.026 vs $0.592. Trinity Large Thinking (high) is faster at 75.86s vs 86.27s, with pass rates of 39.4% vs 16.7%.
- Rank
- #285
- Total Output Tokens
- 130,805
- Response Time (avg)
- 86.27s
- Total Cost
- $0.026
Recommended model
Granite 4.2 8B
Its score stays close to the best score here (4.3 vs 4.8), while costing about 23.3x less than Trinity Large Thinking (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking high | Granite 4.2 8B Granite 4.2 8B none |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 4.8 | 4.3 |
| Rank | #266 | #285 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 8.6 |
| Consistency | 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 39.4% | 16.7% |
| Flaky tests | 8 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 12.473 | 0.847 |
| Total Cost | $0.592 | $0.026 |
| Input Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.100 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.800 / 1M | $0.150 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 101,776 | 57,786 |
| Output Tokens | 276,367 | 130,805 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 656,252 | 0 |
| Response Time (avg) | 75.86s | 86.27s |
| Response Time (max) | 510.21s | 747.17s |
| Response Time (total) | 1668.93s | 1897.96s |
| Parameters | 398B total (13B active) | 8B |
| Availability | Weights available | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#266 Trinity Large Thinking
high- Cost
- $0.028
- Time
- 130.1s
- Tokens
- 34,387 tok
#285 IBM: Granite 4.2 8B
none
Provider returned error
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 0.2s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.7 | 8.1 | 58.3% | 1 | 4.13s | 663 | 3,108 | 7,565 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 4.9 | 8.1 | 33.3% | 1 | 17.77s | 669 | 6,026 | 0 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.7 | 4.7 | 33.3% | 2 | 245.04s | 7,204 | 83,616 | 266,836 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 105.60s | 8,358 | 47,944 | 0 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 262.39s | 76,626 | 14,706 | 149,243 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 424.28s | 30,500 | 29,755 | 0 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 5.8 | 66.7% | 1 | 13.98s | 6,906 | 580 | 9,338 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 2.9 | 5.8 | 16.7% | 1 | 1.05s | 7,629 | 237 | 0 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 2.9 | 7.2 | 11.1% | 1 | 66.94s | 756 | 163,364 | 166,091 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 53.62s | 696 | 38,145 | 0 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.5 | 3.4 | 66.7% | 1 | 12.90s | 501 | 5,700 | 5,942 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 770ms | 534 | 153 | 0 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 6.3 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 4.12s | 684 | 88 | 2,853 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 79.50s | 375 | 1,275 | 0 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 4.7 | 5.2 | 33.3% | 2 | 3.84s | 678 | 2,566 | 3,368 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 107.60s | 472 | 6,964 | 0 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.96s | 7,551 | 282 | 1,440 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.39s | 8,331 | 291 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trinity Large Thinking | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 125.13s | 207 | 2,357 | 43,576 | |
| Granite 4.2 8B | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 14.60s | 222 | 15 | 0 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Trinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5.4 NanononeGranite 4.2 8BnonevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsRing-2.6-1TnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5noneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsHy4 previewnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGLM 4.7 FlashnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsNemotron 3 SupernoneFree AvailableTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsLing-2.6-flashnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsCobuddymediumTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsMercury 2.5 PreviewnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsMercury 2none