Navigate
Advertise here

Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low) vs Seed-2.0-Lite

The average score is effectively tied at 6.2 vs 6.2. Seed-2.0-Lite has the lower benchmark cost at $0.066 vs $0.620. Seed-2.0-Lite is faster at 4.37s vs 5.68s, with pass rates of 43.9% vs 40.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-29

Compared models

Rank
#232
Total Output Tokens
28,630
Response Time (avg)
5.68s
Total Cost
$0.620
Rank
#229
Total Output Tokens
14,744
Response Time (avg)
4.37s
Total Cost
$0.066
Recommended model Seed-2.0-Lite

It has the best score here (6.2), while costing about 9.5x less than Claude Sonnet 5.5 (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Sonnet 5.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 low Release: 2026-09-29 Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite none Release: 2026-02-14
Score 6.2 6.2
Rank #232 #229
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.4 8.9
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 43.9% 40.9%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.880 0.813
Total Cost $0.620 $0.066
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Output Price $10.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 166,418 142,206
Output Tokens 21,456 14,744
Reasoning Tokens 7,174 0
Response Time (avg) 5.68s 4.37s
Response Time (max) 22.74s 44.58s
Response Time (total) 124.87s 96.20s
Parameters ~1T total (~100B active) ~200B total (~20B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#232 Claude Sonnet 5.5

low
Cost
$0.020
Time
15.3s
Tokens
2,077 tok

#229 Seed-2.0-Lite

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
83.8s
Tokens
2,311 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 5.5 3.2 9.7 0.0% 0 5.81s 10,608 5,903 0
Seed-2.0-Lite 5.6 10.0 33.3% 0 2.83s 8,215 410 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair