Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.3-Codex

GPT-5.3-Codex (medium) leads on average score with 8.9 vs 7.3. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.661 vs $0.920. Claude Sonnet 4.6 is faster at 8.12s vs 16.96s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 83.3%.

Recommended modelGPT-5.3-Codex (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.9) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Release: 2026-02-17 GPT-5.3-Codex GPT-5.3-Codex medium Release: 2026-02-05
Score 7.3 8.9
Rank #71 #18
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 83.3%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.502 5.748
Total Cost $0.661 $0.920
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $1.750 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $14.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 123,264 81,268
Output Tokens 19,362 6,251
Reasoning Tokens 0 49,274
Response Time (avg) 8.12s 16.96s
Response Time (max) 51.18s 100.93s
Response Time (total) 121.78s 373.19s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#71 Claude Sonnet 4.6

none
Cost
$0.038
Time
27.3s
Tokens
2,598 tok

#18 GPT-5.3-Codex

medium
Cost
$0.049
Time
54.9s
Tokens
3,580 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 5.19s 8,522 2,127 0
GPT-5.3-Codex 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 19.50s 7,302 535 10,890

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair