Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs StepFun: Step 3.7 Flash

Summary

Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. Step 3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.341 vs $1.418. Step 3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 15.74s vs 17.06s, with pass rates of 65.1% vs 68.3%.

Recommended modelStep 3.7 Flash (low)Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.8), while costing about 4.2x less than Claude Sonnet 4.6 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-14

Metric Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Release: 2026-02-17 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-05-29
Score 7.8 7.7
Rank #40 #51
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.1 8.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 65.1% 68.3%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 10.904 2.840
Total Cost $1.418 $0.341
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 49,112 40,101
Output Tokens 54,703 289,325
Reasoning Tokens 29,970 0
Response Time (avg) 17.06s 15.74s
Response Time (max) 46.35s 124.75s
Response Time (total) 221.83s 330.63s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#40 Claude Sonnet 4.6

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#51 Step 3.7 Flash

low
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.004
Time
25.3s
Tokens
3,072 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Sonnet 4.6 5.7 6.6 44.4% 1 33.29s 6,995 16,089 3,686
Step 3.7 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 9.46s 7,437 18,685 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair