Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Claude Opus 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

Claude Opus 5 (medium) leads on average score with 9.2 vs 9.2. Qwen3.7 Max (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.116 vs $1.486. Claude Opus 5 (medium) is faster at 9.38s vs 40.57s, with pass rates of 83.3% vs 87.9%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 5 (medium)It has the best score here (9.2), while responding about 4.3x faster than Qwen3.7 Max (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 medium Release: 2026-07-25 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max medium Release: 2026-05-22
Score 9.2 9.2
Rank #12 #13
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.3
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 83.3% 87.9%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.253 8.292
Total Cost $1.486 $1.116
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 135,607 106,020
Output Tokens 25,673 5,748
Reasoning Tokens 6,930 211,004
Response Time (avg) 9.38s 40.57s
Response Time (max) 35.05s 556.06s
Response Time (total) 206.26s 892.57s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#12 Claude Opus 5

medium
Cost
$0.125
Time
69.3s
Tokens
5,134 tok

#13 Qwen3.7 Max

medium
Cost
$0.017
Time
68.8s
Tokens
4,526 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 9.56s 10,590 5,224 1,162
Qwen3.7 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 35.31s 7,893 423 34,808

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair