Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.8 vs Meta: Muse Spark 1.1

Summary

The average score is effectively tied at 8.8 vs 8.9. Claude Opus 4.8 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.107 vs $1.152. Claude Opus 4.8 (medium) is faster at 9.72s vs 23.35s, with pass rates of 84.1% vs 76.2%.

Recommended modelClaude Opus 4.8 (medium)It has the best score here (8.8), while responding about 2.4x faster than Muse Spark 1.1 (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-16

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 medium Release: 2026-05-28 Muse Spark 1.1 Muse Spark 1.1 medium Release: 2026-07-16
Score 8.8 8.9
Rank #16 #15
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.2
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 84.1% 76.2%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 6.512 7.676
Total Cost $1.107 $1.152
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $1.250 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $4.250 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 61,007 59,928
Output Tokens 26,495 3,523
Reasoning Tokens 5,901 249,752
Response Time (avg) 9.72s 23.35s
Response Time (max) 38.03s 165.38s
Response Time (total) 204.19s 490.40s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#16 Claude Opus 4.8

medium
Cost
$0.057
Time
23.1s
Tokens
2,412 tok

#15 Muse Spark 1.1

medium
Cost
$0.024
Time
29.2s
Tokens
5,774 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.33s 10,590 9,945 1,381
Muse Spark 1.1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.66s 8,562 347 23,562

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair