Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.6 vs MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

Summary

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K2.6 benchmark comparison: Kimi K2.6 leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. Kimi K2.6 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.888 vs $2.053. Claude Opus 4.6 is faster at 25.89s vs 71.67s, with pass rates of 61.9% vs 65.1%.

Recommended model: Kimi K2.6 - It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 2.3x less than Claude Opus 4.6.

Last updated at: 2026-07-02

Metric Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Release: 2026-02-05 Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 medium Release: 2026-04-20 Free Available
Score 7.7 7.8
Rank #40 #36
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 61.9% 65.1%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 17.103 8.358
Total Cost $2.053 $0.888
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.660 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $3.410 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 53,227 29,450
Output Tokens 47,446 102,923
Reasoning Tokens 24,000 254,094
Response Time (avg) 25.89s 71.67s
Response Time (max) 83.40s 406.78s
Response Time (total) 362.49s 1433.36s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#40 Claude Opus 4.6

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#36 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

medium
Cost
$0.013
Time
103.4s
Tokens
3,620 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 6.4 5.8 66.7% 2 7.45s 840 986 1,071
Kimi K2.6 7.0 8.0 66.7% 1 11.59s 618 7,115 8,934
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 5.7 7.1 44.4% 1 30.10s 8,522 13,057 4,121
Kimi K2.6 5.7 8.6 33.3% 0 214.42s 2,925 9,970 77,189
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 76.66s 20,685 8,178 5,194
Kimi K2.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 40.96s 11,271 711 13,876
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 7.37s 8,676 691 757
Kimi K2.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 20.38s 7,014 316 11,305
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 83.40s 674 14,642 8,687
Kimi K2.6 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 202.38s 326 47,035 98,262
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 5.04s 564 188 292
Kimi K2.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 17.83s 477 3,981 4,472
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.43s 792 266 467
Kimi K2.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 12.53s 669 3,977 5,269
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 4.71s 816 532 630
Kimi K2.6 6.0 7.4 55.6% 1 25.06s 651 13,860 17,599
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 9.73s 11,454 861 329
Kimi K2.6 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 8.92s 5,286 248 1,011
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 63.24s 204 8,045 2,452
Kimi K2.6 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 130.27s 213 15,710 16,177

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair