- Rank
- #98
- Total Output Tokens
- 40,466
- Response Time (avg)
- 13.30s
- Total Cost
- $3.471
Claude Fable 5.1 (high) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash (medium)
Claude Fable 5.1 (high) leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.9. MiMo-V2.6-Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.218 vs $3.471. Claude Fable 5.1 (high) is faster at 13.30s vs 61.90s, with pass rates of 85.5% vs 66.7%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #103
- Total Output Tokens
- 631,843
- Response Time (avg)
- 61.90s
- Total Cost
- $0.218
Recommended model
Claude Fable 5.1 (high)
It has the best score here (7.9), while responding about 4.7x faster than MiMo-V2.6-Flash (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.1 Claude Fable 5.1 high | MiMo-V2.6-Flash MiMo-V2.6-Flash medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Rank | #98 | #103 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 85.5% | 66.7% |
| Flaky tests | 1 | 6 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 18.264 | 1.815 |
| Total Cost | $3.471 | $0.218 |
| Input Price | $10.000 / 1M | $0.140 / 1M |
| Output Price | $50.000 / 1M | $0.280 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 144,676 | 291,988 |
| Output Tokens | 8,184 | 8,848 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 32,282 | 622,995 |
| Response Time (avg) | 13.30s | 61.90s |
| Response Time (max) | 40.17s | 357.28s |
| Response Time (total) | 305.83s | 1423.67s |
| Parameters | ~9.5T total (~878B active) | 309B total (15B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#98 Claude Fable 5.1
high- Cost
- $0.384
- Time
- 102.5s
- Tokens
- 7,824 tok
#103 MiMo-V2.6-Flash
medium- Cost
- $0.004
- Time
- 61.0s
- Tokens
- 10,798 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 6.93s | 8,718 | 254 | 141 | |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 90.14s | 170,748 | 1,332 | 14,533 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.90s | 858 | 287 | 790 | |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 5.9 | 4.1 | 66.7% | 3 | 1.42s | 621 | 392 | 1,180 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 8.4 | 7.4 | 88.9% | 1 | 13.91s | 10,608 | 520 | 6,503 | |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 7.2 | 5.1 | 77.8% | 2 | 18.23s | 7,422 | 533 | 31,521 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 34.59s | 98,419 | 5,484 | 5,373 | |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 7.1 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 20.70s | 96,199 | 4,856 | 17,422 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.30s | 10,515 | 312 | 403 | |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.75s | 7,746 | 257 | 1,186 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 24.34s | 990 | 63 | 12,436 | |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 235.06s | 744 | 586 | 323,671 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.40s | 714 | 291 | 0 | |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 4.1 | 2.7 | 33.3% | 1 | 2.34s | 492 | 99 | 392 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.60s | 921 | 97 | 263 | |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.13s | 672 | 75 | 507 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.11s | 912 | 506 | 558 | |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 7.8 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 52.85s | 660 | 406 | 69,126 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.30s | 11,757 | 354 | 118 | |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.63s | 6,474 | 240 | 190 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 30.58s | 264 | 16 | 5,697 | |
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 357.28s | 210 | 72 | 163,267 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Claude Fable 5.1highvsGLM 5.3 FlashXmaxClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.4 MinimediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.5-27BmediumQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsMiMo-V2.6-FlashmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.7 MaxnoneClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.6 TerralowMiMo-V2.6-FlashmediumvsGLM 5.3highClaude Fable 5.1highvsGemini 3.8 FlashmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.4 NanomediumQwen3.7 MaxnonevsMiMo-V2.6-FlashmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsGemini 3.5 FlashmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsNemotron 3 UltramediumFree Available