Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↓.
359/359
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #65 | Qwen3.8 27B high | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.4 | ~$0.287 | 2/2 | 34.9s |
| #66 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.477 | 2/2 | 2.71s |
| #67 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.951 | 2/2 | 37.8s |
| #68 | GPT-6 Sol low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.273 | 2/2 | 13.6s |
| #69 | Inkling Small high | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.398 | 2/2 | 3.99s |
| #70 | GLM 5.3 FlashX max | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.508 | 2/2 | 3.38s |
| #72 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.673 | 2/2 | 3.22s |
| #73 | GPT-6 Luna high | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.054 | 2/2 | 24.5s |
| #74 | Claude Fable 5.1 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.3 | $2.909 | 2/2 | 4.47s |
| #75 | Gemini 2.5 Flash medium | 10.0 | 8.2 | $0.644 | 2/2 | 4.06s | |
| #76 | Muse Spark 1.3 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.2 | $0.689 | 2/2 | 3.62s |
| #77 | Claude Sonnet 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.2 | $0.922 | 2/2 | 3.16s |
| #78 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B low | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.1 | $2.672 | 2/2 | 22.3s |
| #79 | GPT-5 Mini medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.1 | $0.241 | 2/2 | 12.6s |
| #80 | Muse Glimmer 30B xhigh | Meta | 10.0 | 8.1 | $0.510 | 2/2 | 19.8s |