AI BENCHY Category
Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↓.
Models Shown
15
Average Data parsing and extraction Score
9.0
Best Model
Gemini 3 Flash Preview 10.0| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #70 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.7 | 2/2 | 1.01s |
| #72 | Hunter Alpha none | OpenRouter | 10.0 | 5.7 | 2/2 | 8.49s |
| #75 | GLM 5.1 none | Z.ai | 10.0 | 5.6 | 2/2 | 1.08s |
| #77 | GLM 5 Turbo none | Z.ai | 10.0 | 5.5 | 2/2 | 2.47s |
| #78 | Trinity Large Preview none | Arcee AI | 10.0 | 5.3 | 2/2 | 3.26s |
| #79 | Grok 4.20 Beta none | X AI | 10.0 | 5.3 | 2/2 | 601ms |
| #82 | Grok 4.20 none | X AI | 10.0 | 5.2 | 2/2 | 522ms |
| #83 | Mistral Small 4 none | Mistral | 10.0 | 5.2 | 2/2 | 822ms |
| #86 | GPT-5.4 Mini none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 5.1 | 2/2 | 1.30s |
| #88 | Nemotron 3 Super none | NVIDIA | 10.0 | 5.1 | 2/2 | 7.92s |
| #89 | GPT-4o-mini none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 4.9 | 2/2 | 1.27s |
| #90 | Qwen3.5-9B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 4.8 | 2/2 | 847ms |
| #95 | Grok 4.1 Fast none | X AI | 10.0 | 4.5 | 2/2 | 943ms |
| #13 | GLM 5 medium | Z.ai | 7.1 | 8.4 | 1/2 | 8.90s |
| #23 | MiMo-V2-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 7.3 | 8.1 | 1/2 | 17.2s |