Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Tests Correct ↑.
359/359
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #117 | GPT-5.4 Nano medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.142 | 2/2 | 2.54s |
| #118 | GPT-5.6 Terra low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.420 | 2/2 | 919ms |
| #119 | Grok 4.7 high | X AI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $2.180 | 2/2 | 8.65s |
| #120 | MiniMax M3 medium | Minimax | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.300 | 2/2 | 14.9s |
| #121 | GPT 5.3 Chat none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.533 | 2/2 | 2.21s |
| #122 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.459 | 2/2 | 46.9s |
| #123 | Qwen3.5-27B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.982 | 2/2 | 30.3s |
| #124 | Mercury 2.5 Preview medium | Inception | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.024 | 2/2 | 2.77s |
| #125 | GPT-5.4 Mini medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.786 | 2/2 | 2.43s |
| #126 | Grok Build 0.1 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 7.5 | $1.130 | 2/2 | 10.7s |
| #127 | Gemini 3.8 Flash low | 10.0 | 7.5 | $0.239 | 2/2 | 2.34s | |
| #128 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.117 | 2/2 | 2.29s | |
| #129 | Qwen3.7 Max none | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.197 | 2/2 | 1.35s |
| #130 | Kimi K2.7 Code medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.671 | 2/2 | 12.3s |
| #131 | GPT-5.6 Luna medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.072 | 2/2 | 1.95s |