Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen3.5-Flash inaongoza kwa average score: 6.1 vs 5.8. Qwen3.5-Flash ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.073 vs $0.184. Kimi K2.6 ni ya haraka zaidi: 19.58s vs 25.28s, na pass rates 34.9% vs 39.4%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaQwen3.5-FlashIt has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 2.5x less than Kimi K2.6.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-20

Kipimo Kimi K2.6 Kimi K2.6 none Toleo: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Toleo: 2026-02-24
Alama 5.8 6.1
Nafasi #138 #125
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 9.3 9.3
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 34.9% 39.4%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 2 2
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 3.199 0.933
Jumla ya gharama $0.184 $0.073
Bei ya ingizo $0.684 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $3.420 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 116,970 282,347
Tokeni za matokeo 30,253 209,201
Tokeni za hoja 0 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 19.58s 25.28s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 238.89s 480.96s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 430.85s 556.24s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#138 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.6

none
Gharama
$0.020
Muda
127.4s
Tokeni
4,429 tok

#125 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Gharama
$0.003
Muda
47.4s
Tokeni
7,799 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Kimi K2.6 5.5 9.8 33.3% 0 82.57s 5,986 14,754 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho