Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

average score iko karibu sawa: 6.1 vs 6.1. Qwen3.5-Flash ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.073 vs $0.114. Qwen3.5-Flash ni ya haraka zaidi: 25.28s vs 54.87s, na pass rates 56.1% vs 39.4%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaQwen3.5-FlashIt has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 1.6x less than GPT-5 Nano (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-17

Kipimo GPT-5 Nano GPT-5 Nano medium Toleo: 2025-08-07 Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Toleo: 2026-02-24
Alama 6.1 6.1
Nafasi #121 #118
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 7.0 9.3
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 56.1% 39.4%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 8 2
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 1.267 0.933
Jumla ya gharama $0.114 $0.073
Bei ya ingizo $0.050 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $0.400 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 94,935 282,347
Tokeni za matokeo 12,042 209,201
Tokeni za hoja 261,056 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 54.87s 25.28s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 227.89s 480.96s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 822.99s 556.24s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#121 GPT-5 Nano

medium
Gharama
$0.006
Muda
108.5s
Tokeni
13,209 tok

#118 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Gharama
$0.003
Muda
47.4s
Tokeni
7,799 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
GPT-5 Nano 7.0 7.7 55.6% 1 41.62s 7,305 740 41,152
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho